Showing posts with label law enforcement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label law enforcement. Show all posts
Thursday, April 5, 2012
Deputy Minister of Law and Human Rights Slapping action
Slapping action by Indonesian deputy minister of law and human rights Denny Indrayana when make unannounced visits at prisons Class II Pekanbaru Riau, Indonesia. it's a slap in the face occurred on Monday (2/4) night when Denny was accompanied by his aide with officials of the National Narcotics Agency (BNN) dressed all in black and wanted to take the lid face three prisoners suspected of money laundering drug use in prisons IIA Pekanbaru.
With the door closed, Denny jump to the gate. He banged the door open and ask. Officials did not immediately open the door because there are still procedures should contact the head of the prison. Denny angry and going war of words. Denny slapped Darso and his aides kicked other prison officers. Continue to ask these three rooms. Then escorted to the key holder by the officer who had a key, name Maslan, it was held by the aide of his collar.
Member of the House of Representatives Commission II of the Republic of Indonesia Agun Gunanjar Sudarsa asked President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono dismissed for having slapped Denny Indrayana Prison officers Pekanbaru Darso Sihombing Class IIA. As a Deputy Minister, legal experts and law professor, said Agun, Denny Indrayana should not do that.
"I asked the president to immediately dismiss Denny. Denny slapping action and kicked his aides do not deserve a prison officer by a law expert, professor of law and the Deputy Minister of Justice and Human Rights. This action can not be left without any consequences, "said Agun
Denny denied slapping. He argued it did not occur to prevent the slapping.
Whatever really happened at the time of the incident is still not worthy of a deputy minister of human rights law and the acts of violence. Denny should provide a good example as a deputy minister is to respect the law and run in accordance with legal procedure itself. Bad history in law enforcement in our beloved country.
Friday, January 14, 2011
Corruption Court bill
Corruption in Indonesia so rampant, almost to the line and institutions, despite efforts
pemberantasannya been done since the 1960s. So the foreign press is always referred
Indonesia as the sick man of Asia because of corruption has menggurita to various sectors
development.
Now, when Presiden.Yudhoyono lead this country, he has a strong obsession for
corruption. Therefore, issues that need to be addressed are, first, the Bill
Court Corruption (Corruption). Making Corruption Bill should promptly in
prepare specific professional judges. Second, eliminate the provision permits the President to
corrupt state officials.
Presidential Permit
Conditions of permits the President to examine the state officials involved in corruption during the
inhibit the effectiveness of treatment and prevention of corruption cases. Article 106 of Law No.
22/2003 concerning the composition and position of the MPR, DPR, DPD, and DPRD and Article 36 of Law No. 32 /
2004 on Regional Government are equally set the permission of state inspection officials.
From the legal perspective of government, the nature of consent as a form of preventive control
to prevent violations of the law. Therefore, the permission checks that state officials suspected
same as protecting corrupt embezzler normatively. Permits the President at the request of investigators,
according to Article 36 Paragraph (1) Law No. 32/2004, in some cases likely to be misused investigators
"protect" corrupt on the pretext still waiting for permission of the President. And maybe
petition to the President was never sent.
Permit inspection Discrimination state officials to prove discrimination and
ignore the principle of equality before the law between state officials and employees, other countries
involved in corruption. The equation is one of the civil rights that the absolute character
should not be violated by anyone in accordance with Article 28 D of the 1945 Constitution yo Article 4 of Law No
39/1999 on Human Rights.
In politics legislation, in order to create a responsive law in accordance with the demands and expectations
community, the provision of law permits the President in a positive need to be removed. Permits the President to
replaced by a written notice to the authorities investigating hierarchically related to the President as
report.
The report was to supervise the examination of state officials suspected of corruption. Thus, supervision
government needs to be improved although the people still doubt the objectivity of supervision
considering regional watchdog appointed head of regional officials.
In addition, the need to reopen the file corruption in the areas of government in creating a
clean in a way; first, held back in the corruption cases that still "settle".
Second, regional head of the abuses of authority because "for-for" projects in a way
direct appointment to be processed as soon as possible.
pemberantasannya been done since the 1960s. So the foreign press is always referred
Indonesia as the sick man of Asia because of corruption has menggurita to various sectors
development.
Now, when Presiden.Yudhoyono lead this country, he has a strong obsession for
corruption. Therefore, issues that need to be addressed are, first, the Bill
Court Corruption (Corruption). Making Corruption Bill should promptly in
prepare specific professional judges. Second, eliminate the provision permits the President to
corrupt state officials.
Presidential Permit
Conditions of permits the President to examine the state officials involved in corruption during the
inhibit the effectiveness of treatment and prevention of corruption cases. Article 106 of Law No.
22/2003 concerning the composition and position of the MPR, DPR, DPD, and DPRD and Article 36 of Law No. 32 /
2004 on Regional Government are equally set the permission of state inspection officials.
From the legal perspective of government, the nature of consent as a form of preventive control
to prevent violations of the law. Therefore, the permission checks that state officials suspected
same as protecting corrupt embezzler normatively. Permits the President at the request of investigators,
according to Article 36 Paragraph (1) Law No. 32/2004, in some cases likely to be misused investigators
"protect" corrupt on the pretext still waiting for permission of the President. And maybe
petition to the President was never sent.
Permit inspection Discrimination state officials to prove discrimination and
ignore the principle of equality before the law between state officials and employees, other countries
involved in corruption. The equation is one of the civil rights that the absolute character
should not be violated by anyone in accordance with Article 28 D of the 1945 Constitution yo Article 4 of Law No
39/1999 on Human Rights.
In politics legislation, in order to create a responsive law in accordance with the demands and expectations
community, the provision of law permits the President in a positive need to be removed. Permits the President to
replaced by a written notice to the authorities investigating hierarchically related to the President as
report.
The report was to supervise the examination of state officials suspected of corruption. Thus, supervision
government needs to be improved although the people still doubt the objectivity of supervision
considering regional watchdog appointed head of regional officials.
In addition, the need to reopen the file corruption in the areas of government in creating a
clean in a way; first, held back in the corruption cases that still "settle".
Second, regional head of the abuses of authority because "for-for" projects in a way
direct appointment to be processed as soon as possible.
Eradication of corruption in Indonesia
Shouts some circles that Bill Court Corruption (Corruption Court bill) discussed in the parliament soon as there are no echoes. Rather than enter a priority, this bill has not even submitted to Parliament during this session to IV. Until now, the Corruption Court bill was still in the hands of the president.
"Unfortunately, the Corruption Court bill not a priority. This is very important when considering the Corruption Court related to the existence of the KPK, "said Senior Researcher Center for Law and Policy Studies (PSHK) Bivitri Susanti, Tuesday (13 / 5).
Based on the Constitutional Court's decision earlier in December 2006, the Corruption Court by a separate statute, not by Law No. 30 of 2002 on the Commission for Eradication of Corruption. The Court gave three years for the formation of a special law giving the legal umbrella for Corruption Court. Thus, given the Constitutional Court deadline is December 2009.
Council members busy dealing with the 2009 General Election and therefore could not meet the deadline given the Court. If this happens, not only would weaken the Commission, the eradication of corruption will also reap serious obstacles.
In a plenary session of Parliament yesterday revealed that the government has not passed the Corruption Court bill to the House. The government just told the three other bill to the House of Representatives discussed. This will certainly be a step backward in law enforcement efforts to eradicate corruption in Indonesia.
"Unfortunately, the Corruption Court bill not a priority. This is very important when considering the Corruption Court related to the existence of the KPK, "said Senior Researcher Center for Law and Policy Studies (PSHK) Bivitri Susanti, Tuesday (13 / 5).
Based on the Constitutional Court's decision earlier in December 2006, the Corruption Court by a separate statute, not by Law No. 30 of 2002 on the Commission for Eradication of Corruption. The Court gave three years for the formation of a special law giving the legal umbrella for Corruption Court. Thus, given the Constitutional Court deadline is December 2009.
Council members busy dealing with the 2009 General Election and therefore could not meet the deadline given the Court. If this happens, not only would weaken the Commission, the eradication of corruption will also reap serious obstacles.
In a plenary session of Parliament yesterday revealed that the government has not passed the Corruption Court bill to the House. The government just told the three other bill to the House of Representatives discussed. This will certainly be a step backward in law enforcement efforts to eradicate corruption in Indonesia.
Wasior flash floods in Irian Jaya Indonesia


Flash floods that destroyed Wasior City, the capital of Wondama Bay District, West Papua, allegedly triggered by the illegal logging activities (illegal logging). Damage to nature there is the impact of excessive forest exploitation.
This was revealed by Minister of Forestry Zulkifli Hassan in Jakarta, he said, signs of illegal logging are found in West Papua region, such as South Sorong and Wasior. Ministry of Forestry has been aggressively enforcing the law to combat illegal logging. Along with that, Zulkifli Hasan hopes more enterprising people to plant trees to minimize the potential for natural disasters. "Our job is to constantly planting trees, especially in the mountains to avoid the occurrence of natural disasters,"
Wasior Village, in Papua Flash Flood affected, look chaotic and messy, Saturday (9 / 10). At least 147 people dead and 66 missing and 800 injured, as data released by the Government. The government says that this is caused by high rainfall while the Forum for Environment (WALHI) assess flash flood in the City Wasior, Papua, was caused by the destruction of forests in the area of Bay County Wondama. Controversy about the causes of the disaster stuck. Environmental groups such as Forum for Environment life blamed illegal logging as a ringleader. In fact, WALHI claims to have evidence of the photographs the result of illegal logging of timber carried on flash floods.
If it floods in Wasior appeal was caused by illegal logging / illegal logging, the Indonesian government should fully investigate cases of illegal logging in Papua is in accordance with the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 41 of 1999 on forestry and the search party should be responsible upon the occurrence of this disaster. Indonesian police are expected to work objectively and not selective logging.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
